Custom BIONICLE Wiki:Vote for Adminship

This is the page where you can vote for someone who deserves to be a sysop. If selected by popular vote, the user(s) selected will be promoted by one of our bureaucrats.

Rules

 * Be civilized. No rude or impolite comments.
 * Do not make up new accounts to vote for someone. This will result in disqualification if discovered.
 * Sign your username with four ~'s like on a talk page.
 * The person you vote for should be regularly active and have been on the wiki for at least a month. They should also have at least 500 edits.
 * You are allowed to nominate yourself, but you are not permitted to vote in that occasion.

How to Vote
Please post your nominee like this below the "Nominees" section:

To vote, write "#" and then the following:
 * Why you think they deserve it.
 * Your signature.

Voting with up to 15 participants requires a 5:2 ratio of votes for passage; those with more need a 2:1 ratio.

Yeah. I know this is kinda a stretch, but I'm on a lot even though I don't have many edits. I remove/undo vandalism/spam/etc. if I ever come across it. I don't expect to succeed in this, but I'm never going to succeed if I never try. Nuju of Ice 14:27, April 21, 2011 (UTC)

For

Against
 * 1) Sorry, I don't think you should be promoted at this point. You're a good user, and I recognize your contributions at this point, but you're pretty new and I think you should have more time to get recognized. Sli  cer   Out  00:59, April 30, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Toa11
I wasn't on very much at the beginning of my membership but now ive been very active and have almost made 100 edits in 2 days. Toa11

For

Against
 * 1) Are you kidding? If we gave people rollback status after 200 edits, everyone would have the title. I see no evidence whatsoever that you deserve this, and you don't even have a real reason for us to give you the position. Rollback status isn't an award--it's something given to those who we can trust to make good decisions in reverting unhelpful edits. Sli  cer   Out  00:59, April 30, 2011 (UTC)

Comments